If you found this page, you wanted proof.

$339.53M. On-chain.

Stake's traceable reserves as of May 28, 2026. The methodology, the peer comparison, the 2023 hack, and exactly how to verify it yourself every Tuesday at 16:37 UTC. Whisper MAXBET when you're satisfied.

$339,530,000

Snapshot: May 28, 2026 at 05:54 UTC · +2.68% (1 week)

Source: cryptotips.com/on-chain/stake/ (citing Arkham Intelligence) · Updated weekly, Tuesdays 16:37 UTC

7.9M
Addresses tracked
#1
Of 11 tracked operators
$42.98
USD per address (avg)

Arkham vs Merkle tree: which does Stake use

Three methodologies exist for "proof of reserves." They're not equivalent. Knowing which one Stake uses, and what it proves, is the honest starting point.

Merkle tree attestation, the gold standard

The operator takes a point-in-time snapshot of all user balances, hashes each one into a tree structure, and publishes a single cryptographic root. Any user can verify their balance was included without seeing anyone else's data. An independent auditor signs the wallet ownership and compares total on-chain assets to total Merkle liabilities. Used by Kraken and Phemex. Stake has never published a Merkle tree proof of reserves.

Simple wallet attestation, weaker

The platform publishes known wallet addresses and invites users to check balances on a block explorer. This proves assets exist but says nothing about liabilities, you cannot tell whether the operator owes players more than it holds. Useful but incomplete.

Arkham entity labeling, what Stake uses

Arkham Intelligence clusters wallet addresses into entity profiles using AI pattern recognition, Common Input Ownership Heuristic, off-chain data (news, court records), and community bounties. For Stake, it has clustered 7.9 million addresses across Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Tron, Polygon, Bitcoin, and more. This is the most comprehensive public picture available, but it shows demonstrable assets, not verified liabilities.

Bottom line: Arkham labeling shows what Stake demonstrably controls on-chain. It does not verify that those assets exceed player liabilities. There is no independent auditor attestation, no Merkle root, no way for an individual player to confirm their balance is included in the total. What it does provide: a continuously updated, publicly verifiable, nine-figure asset floor that anyone can check without trusting a press release.

Sources: Phemex Academy, Merkle tree proof of reserves, Arkham Intel, Stake entity, cryptotips.com/on-chain/stake/

May 28, 2026 snapshot: full breakdown

Chain distribution

ChainUSD valueShareDominant asset
Ethereum$259,240,00074%ETH
Solana$50,000,00014%SOL
BNB Chain$20,670,0006%BSC-USD
Tron$17,020,0005%USDT
Polygon$4,230,0001%USDC
Bitcoin$78,020<0.1%BTC

Hot wallet assets

AssetUSD valuePrice at snapshot
ETH$186,770,000$2,314.72
USDC$54,520,000$1.00
SOL$36,130,000$85.99
USDT$36,100,000$1.00
BSC-USD$8,440,000$1.00
DAI$7,940,000$1.00
WETH$7,120,000$2,312.84

Five-week trend

1-week change +$8.87M (+2.68%)
4-week change -$9.25M (-2.65%)
5-week range $330.66M – $351.94M

A notable pattern: Bitcoin is effectively a rounding error at $78,020 for a casino that heavily markets BTC gaming. Incoming BTC deposits are swept into ETH and stablecoins quickly, volatility is hedged off the operational book. The stablecoin float (USDC, USDT, BSC-USD, DAI) sits in the nine-figure range by design, matching player balances in dollar-denominated assets.

Source: cryptotips.com/on-chain/stake/ (citing Arkham Intelligence, snapshot May 28, 2026)

Peer comparison: 11 operators ranked

Stake holds more than three times Rollbit's reserves. Nearly thirty times Roobet's. This is what operating the world's largest crypto casino book looks like on-chain.

RankOperatorTagged reserves (USD)Addresses tracked
1Stake.com$339.53M7.9M
2Rollbit$96.68M352K
3Rainbet.com$60.82M377K
4Betfury$24.46M200K
5BC.Game$23.57M1.6M
6Roobet.com$11.59M3.2M
7Cloudbet$5.31M161K
81xBet$2.17M1.4M
9Gamdom.com$625.5K183K
10Phenom Poker$83.8K96
11FortuneJack$56.7K357K

Roobet has a comparable player count to Stake but sits at roughly 1/29th of Stake's on-chain footprint. As noted by the cryptotips.com analysis: "that gap does not map to Stake being twenty times more trustworthy, it maps to Stake running the biggest book and keeping more of its float on-chain in plain view."

Caveat: The comparison reflects what Arkham has tagged, not necessarily total operator reserves. Any operator could hold untagged wallets not yet clustered. These numbers are floors, not ceilings.

Source: cryptotips.com/on-chain/stake/, May 28, 2026 snapshot

Don't take our word for it

Pull up cryptotips.com/on-chain/stake/ every Tuesday after 16:37 UTC. That's where the weekly snapshot lands. Check the money yourself, then use MAXBET at the promo code page.

September 2023: the $41.3M Lazarus hack

On 4 September 2023, unauthorized transactions drained approximately $41.3 million from Stake.com's operational hot wallets, one of the largest single crypto casino hacks on record. On 7 September 2023, the FBI formally attributed it to North Korea's Lazarus Group, the same state-sponsored unit behind the $600M Ronin Bridge hack and the $35M Atomic Wallet attack.

What was taken

~$16M from Ethereum, ETH plus USDT, USDC, and DAI from hot wallets. ~$25.6M from BNB Chain and Polygon, MATIC and BNB. Total: $41.3M across three chains in a single coordinated attack.

How it happened

Co-founder Ed Craven confirmed private keys were not directly compromised. The attack targeted a third-party transaction authorization service Stake used for Ethereum, Polygon, and BNB Chain, a breach that allowed unauthorized outbound transactions without holding the keys themselves.

Lazarus Group laundering path

ETH and BSC assets swapped to unfreezable native assets. Polygon MATIC routed via Squid Router → USDT/USDC → Avalanche → wrapped BTC → native Bitcoin. Funds moved through Bitcoin mixer Sinbad, then to Tron via SWFT Bridge. A laundering path characteristic of Lazarus operations.

Operational recovery

Stake spotted the breach within 20 minutes and restored full deposit and withdrawal operations within hours. Craven stated: "The loss of funds is by no means a trivial amount, but this attack has not materially affected Stake's operations." Arkham-tracked reserves remained above $300M in the following weeks. User funds were not affected.

Sources: TRM Labs, FBI Lazarus attribution, BleepingComputer, DL News, Ed Craven statement

How to verify every week

The primary verification source for this page is cryptotips.com/on-chain/stake/. Their methodology is explicit: they take weekly manual snapshots of Arkham's tagged wallet cluster every Tuesday at 16:37 UTC. They don't run Arkham and don't influence its clustering, if Arkham updates the cluster between snapshots, the change appears the following Tuesday. Each snapshot is published with a dated timestamp and labeled explicitly as a floor: "on-chain reserves are a floor, not a ceiling."

You can also check directly at intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/stake-com, sort the holdings, watch the same numbers. The wallets are labelled, the balances are live. Nobody's asking you to trust a logo.

cryptotips.com recommends using reserve data alongside payout test results, licensing assessments, and dispute history, not in isolation. A $339M on-chain float is meaningful evidence of operational solvency. It's not proof that assets exceed total player liabilities, because player liabilities are not publicly disclosed.

What on-chain reserves don't prove

Liabilities are invisible

On-chain reserves show what Stake holds, not what it owes players. A casino paying out $1M/day in withdrawals while holding $339M appears solvent, but if player balances totaled $400M, it would technically be insolvent. No public figure reveals player balances.

Arkham clustering is incomplete

7.9 million tracked addresses is the largest casino cluster in Arkham's dataset, but Stake may hold additional wallets in cold storage not yet identified. The reserves figure is a floor.

No Merkle tree verification

Unlike Kraken or Phemex, Stake has never published a Merkle tree proof allowing players to verify their individual balance is included in the total. There is no independent auditor attestation. The available evidence is: Arkham's public tracking, the uninterrupted operation of withdrawals (including rapid resumption post-hack), and the scale of on-chain assets.

Curaçao licence: lighter regulatory weight

Stake is licensed by the Curaçao Gaming Control Board, not the UK Gambling Commission or Malta Gaming Authority. It's not licensed in most markets where its players live. On-chain reserves are the primary non-governmental trust signal available to players in unregulated jurisdictions.

Listen - the hostess will walk you through it.
The hostess's welcome
A short briefing. Read the transcript

Stake holds three hundred and thirty-nine million dollars in traceable on-chain reserves as of the May 28th, 2026 snapshot. That makes it number one of eleven tracked crypto gambling operators, more than three times Rollbit at ninety-seven million, nearly thirty times Roobet. The assets are mostly Ethereum at 74%, plus stablecoins, USDC, USDT, DAI, in the nine-figure range. Bitcoin itself is barely there, because incoming BTC gets swept into ETH and stablecoins quickly. The weekly verification source is cryptotips.com/on-chain/stake, they snapshot Arkham's cluster every Tuesday at 16:37 UTC. In September 2023, North Korea's Lazarus Group drained 41 million dollars from Stake's hot wallets. Stake had withdrawals back up within hours. What reserves don't prove: player liabilities. There's no Merkle tree proof. The honest read is that 339 million dollars is a very solid floor on a platform that processes 18 billion dollars a year in deposits. Tell the dealer WinnersClub sent you.

Questions at the door

$339.53 million as of the May 28, 2026 snapshot, sourced from cryptotips.com (citing Arkham Intelligence). This is updated weekly every Tuesday at 16:37 UTC. The figure is a floor, Stake may hold additional wallets not yet clustered by Arkham.

Arkham is a multi-chain analytics platform that de-anonymizes blockchains using AI pattern recognition, the Common Input Ownership Heuristic, off-chain data, and community bounties. For Stake it's tracked 7.9 million addresses, the largest casino cluster in its dataset. It shows demonstrable on-chain assets, not verified player liabilities.

No. On-chain reserves show assets, not liabilities. Stake has never published a Merkle tree proof of reserves, the gold standard used by Kraken and Phemex. The $339M figure is evidence that Stake is not obviously insolvent. It's not proof that assets exceed player liabilities, which are not publicly disclosed.

Go to cryptotips.com/on-chain/stake/, they snapshot Arkham's wallet cluster every Tuesday at 16:37 UTC. You can also check intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/stake-com directly for live data. Don't take our word for it.

Yes. On 4 September 2023, $41.3M was drained from hot wallets, $16M from Ethereum, $25.6M from BNB Chain and Polygon. The FBI attributed it to North Korea's Lazarus Group on 7 September 2023. Stake restored withdrawals the same day. Arkham-tracked reserves remained above $300M in the weeks after. User funds were not affected.

Tell the dealer WinnersClub sent you.

The code is MAXBET. 200% up to $3,000. The door's open at Stake.com